Health, Food and Water
What you need to know.
Expanded versions of each section are available for download below and are compiled for download in the Supporting Content section of the page.
Health Bullets
- Some of the largest impacts on your health are the personal choices you make about the food you eat, the water you drink and the community you live in. No federal, state or government agency has ever conducted conclusive scientific studies that prove pouring known toxic sewage sludge waste on our food, water and communities is safe.
- The EPA maintains that, of the thousands of known toxic contaminants, the minimal testing requirements of nine elements - arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, zinc and two pathogens are sufficient in "estimating" our health risk of land applied sewage sludge.
- The issue of land application of sewage sludge is two-fold: the infiltration of known toxic waste in America's food and water supply and community impact where sewage sludge is land applied.
- There is no state or national systematic tracking of health incidents related to sewage sludge. In some cases, laws are put into place to remove the community's right to restrict or even test for sewage sludge safety.
- World-wide, scientific studies are linking environmental contamination with; food poisoning infections of salmonella and E. coli, increase in autism, antibiotic resistance superbugs like MRSA, drug resistant pneumonia, groundwater manganese associations with cancer, multi-drug-resistant coliforms occur in rivers, bays, bathing beaches and coastal canals.
Food Bullets
- Although the EPA recognizes that foods absorb heavy metals and pathogens, no regulations monitor the safety of foods grown in sewage sludge farmlands.
- Sewage sludge commonly contains high levels of heavy metals that do not require testing or regulation, yet heavy metals accumulate in the soil where the sludge is spread and in the plants and animal that we ingest.
- With the exception of salmonella and E. coli, the EPA does not require testing for any pathogens, pharmaceuticals, steroids, viruses, hormones or endotoxins.
- Some toxins found in sewage sludge include plutonium, radiation, Teflon type chemicals like PFO's and PFOA's, antibacterial soap byproducts and flame retardants.
- Bureaucracies charged with protecting our health, food and water refuse to "connect the dots" of the application of hazardous sewage sludge to our food source.
- Over 8 million tons of Class B sewage sludge is land applied in America. Class A sewage sludge is land applied without registration requirements.
- Demand safe food - demand the halt of land application of sewage sludge.
Water Bullets
- Lower legal standards for "safe" water and sewage sludge avoid expense and responsibility for industries and municipalities. All expenses are passed on to the health and safety of citizens.
- 1982 EPA studies expressed concerns about sewage sludge creating widespread contamination of bacteria and drug-resistant coliforms into rivers, bays, bathing beaches and coastal canals.
- 2007 EPA national sewage sludge test samples for 145 compounds found toxic concentrations including 28 metals, 11 flame retardants, 72 pharmaceuticals, and 25 steroids and hormones.
- National watershed studies have found pharmaceuticals in the drinking water supply of 28 major metro areas for 41 million Americans - there are no standards, no mandates, no controls to test, treat or limit pharmaceuticals in water.
- Dilution does not work well for pollutants, like bacteria and viruses, which have the capacity for multiplication and adaptation to environmental niches.
- Studies funded by sludge industry recognize the limitations of their own products and the false marketing of "stabilized" sewage sludge from waste water treatment plants.
- Research data from 2004 links arsenic in US drinking water to increases in diabetes. Arsenic also affects lung, skin and kidney cancer, internal bleeding and heart damage, kidney and liver failure, and birth defects.
Supporting Content
To view a file, click on the (pdf) link. To download the file, click on the disk icon on the toolbar on the top left of your screen or click on File and select Save As.
- Expanded Health, Food, and Water Compilation(pdf)
- Research findings from Yale indicating that heat applied to sludge does not kill all pathogens contained within �(pdf)
- Study Finds Fecal Coliforms Appear to Reactivate in Centrifuge Dewatered Solids at Four of Seven Facilities Tested; 2007 Sludge industry (WERF) study showing re-growth of fecal coliforms in treated sludge. (pdf)
- Summary of 2009 Targeted National Sewage Sludge Survey (pdf)
- Overview of 2009 Targeted National Sewage Sludge Survey; EPA study finding contaminants in sewage sludge nationally. (pdf)�
- New Report Finds High Concentrations of Toxic Contaminants in Sewage Sludge; EPA national sewage sludge survey identifies high concentrations of toxic contaminants with heavy metals, steroids and pharmaceuticals, including the antibacterials, triclocarban and triclosan. (pdf)
- Health Survey of Residents Living Near Farm Fields Permitted to Receive Biosolids: 2007 Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health (pdf)
- Bioaersols Generated From Biosolids Applied on Farm Fields in Wood County, Ohio; 2005 study presenting data show higher numbers of bacteria colonies collected downwind from biosolids land application. (pdf)
- 2002 Investigation by Cornell'sWaste Management Institute of alleged health incidents association with land application of sewage sludge. (pdf)
- Autism Epidemic Not Caused By Shift in Diagnoses: Environmental Factors Likely (pdf)
- Drug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs), Rapid Spread in the United States and Elsewhere in the World: 2009 Medscape Infectious Disease Report (pdf)
- "PBDE Byproducts are Ubiquitous in U.S. Waters"; 2009 University of Minnesota and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) studies find compounds produced when PBDE flame retardants are exposed to wastewater treatment can generate dioxins. (pdf)
- Health Agency Covered Up Lead Harm ; 2009 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention withheld evidence that contaminated tap water caused lead poisoning in kids. (pdf)
- CDC to Explore Environmental Links to Disease (pdf)
- Environmental Manganese Good in Trace Amounts But Can Correlate to Cancer Rates; Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center researcher finding groundwater and airborne manganese in North Carolina correlates with cancer mortality at the county level.(pdf)
- 1981 EPA USDA Land Application of Sewage Sludge for the Production of Fruits and Vegetables Policy.(pdf)
- "Sewage-Based Fertilizer Safety Doubted"; 2008 McElmurray vs. USDA landmark case of farm poisoned with �safe� biosolids/sludge.(pdf)
- "He's Not Trusting Toxin Testing" (pdf)
- Sludge Recycling Sends Antiseptic Soap Ingredients to Agriculture; 2006 study shows 75 % of the soap ingredient washed down the drain persists during wastewater treatment and accumulates in municipal sludge, which later is used as fertilizer for crops.(Read Article)
- "The Trouble with Triclosan"; 2009 - Triclosan from consumer products persists in the environment, mixes with other chemicals to form more toxic substances, contributes to the growing problem of bacterial resistance to antibiotics and causes a range of human and ecological health problems.(pdf)
- Canadian Medical Association Calls for Ban on Triclosan 2009 (pdf)
- Food-Related Illness and Death in the United States; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study 1999(pdf)
- US Food Borne Illnesses Up Two to Ten Fold; From Institute of Science in Society (pdf)
- Antibiotic Resistance of E. coli in Sewage Sludge (Read Article)
- Could the E. coli outbreak be linked to irrigation practices? (pdf)
- Persistance of E. coli in Lettuce Fields Linked to Contaminated Water (Read Article)
- USDA Chief Cites Problems in Food Safety System (Read Article)
- How salmonella Contaminates Salad Leaves link (pdf)
- USDA Study confirms link between ethanol by-product and E. coli (pdf)
- Researchers Discover How Infectious Bacteria Can Switch Species; From Science News, 2008. (pdf)
- Additional Trace Contamination of Plutonium Found in Colorado (pdf)
- Firm Monitoring Build-up of Radioactive Materials in Schuylkill, 2009. "However, based on our analysis of sludge that settled out at the Royersford's wastewater treatment plant, we now know that low-level radioactive material in liquid effluents can become concentrated over time." (pdf)
- EPA Finds Record PFO'S, PFOA Levels in Alabama Grazing Fields; Environmental Science & Technology 2009 (pdf)
- "Where can an earthworm go to find good, clean dirt?"; From Scientific American, February 2008 study finding concentrations of toxins in earthworms. (pdf)
- "Widespread Occurrence of Intersex Bass Found in U.S. Rivers" (pdf)
- Study links C8 (PFO's) Exposure to Liver Damage (pdf)
- "Is Pollution Driving Antibiotic Resistance" (pdf)
- Antibiotic Resistant Genes Increase In Soil Microbes, 2009 study published in Journal of Environmental Science & Technology linking antibiotic resistance and soil health. (pdf)
- Salmonella/Tomato Outbreak - Frank Talk and Analysis (pdf)�
- Human Sewage Used for Cereals (Read Article)
- Irish Will Not Cover Grain Produced Using Human Sewage (pdf)�
- UK Sewage Sludge Remains Issue with Growers & Consumers (Read Article)
- Audubon of Florida position paper: "Disposal of Sewage Sludge in Lake Okeechobee Watershed Hurting Everglades Restoration" (pdf)
- Sierra Club Conservation Policies; "Zero Waste-Land Application of Sewage Sludge" (pdf)
- Council on Environmental Quality Revises Water Project Guidance (pdf)
- Proposed National Objectives, Principles and Standards for Water and Related Resources Implementation Studies: December 3, 2009 (pdf)
- EPA Antibiotic-Resistant Coliforms in Wastewater Effluents: 1981 Meckes study on anti-biotic resistance of coliform after treatment (pdf)
- No Standards, No Mandates to Test, Treat or Limit Pharmaceuticals in Water, 2008. Traces of 56 human and veterinary pharmaceuticals have been detected in Philadelphia's drinking water. (pdf)
- Poisoned Communities Tell EPA to Address Legacy of Unequal Protection (pdf)
- A Population-Level Decline in Serum Testosterone Levels in American Men (pdf)
- "Male, interrupted": As genital birth defects in infant boys doubles, attention turns to phthalates, chemicals found in a variety of consumer products (pdf)
- Sewage Altering Fish, Study Reports, 2005. Scientists around the world have found sexual abnormalities in frogs, fish, alligators and other wild animals exposed to sewage effluent and industrial contaminants that mimic estrogens and other hormones. (pdf)�
- Sex-Changing Fish: Caused By Contamination or Nature, 2008 follow-up study (pdf)
- A Rainy Night (or Day) in Georgia? Beware of Salmonella (Read Article)
- Merck Polluting Phila Water (Read Article)
- Yadkin River, NC Contamination From 15.9 Million Gallons of Sewage (pdf)
- Southeast Facilities Ordered to Comply with Clean Water Act; Penalties Total More Than $230,000 (pdf)
- Company and Four Senior Managers Sentenced for Environmental, Worker Safety Crimes After Longest Trial in Environmental Crimes History; 2009. "The managers had an obligation to run the facility safely and legally; instead, they committed environmental crimes that polluted the air and water and put people's health at risk."(pdf)�
HEALTH: IF YOU DON'T POISON THE PEOPLE, YOU DON'T NEED TO FIND A CURE.
What is the value of a healthy life for yourself, your family, your parents and your friends? Your lifestyle, your hometown, your job, your genetic family tree all combine together to create a life balanced with health or illness, safety or danger. Some of the largest impacts on your health are the personal choices you make about the food you eat, the water you drink and the community you live in. What if the food that you consume is fertilized and watered with known heavy metals, infectious waste, bacteria, and other modern toxins? Does the water you drink contain pharmaceuticals and pathogens that will affect your health? Does the playground and park where your family enjoys time together spread sewage sludge to make the grass green? Is the wind that blows across the farm fields where sewage sludge spread near your child's school creating a constant health problem?
The issue of sewage sludge impacts our health whether we eat foods grown in sludge, drink water laced with the contaminants of sludge run-off or live in a community where sewage sludge is used as a "fertilizer" on open space, farm land or gardens. But what is sewage sludge?
Everything that goes down the drain of homes, businesses, industries, hospitals and mortuaries collects at the municipal waste water treatment plants (WWTP). At the WWTP, sewage is heated and chemically treated with the goal of lowering bacteria. Heavy metals and other hazardous chemicals do not go away from the heating or squeezing performed at the WWTP. WWTP were created and intended to separate the liquids from the solids to�clean the water in order to return it to the community. Water returned into the community is called effluence and is often poured directly into waterways, streams and rivers or used to water crops or lawns. The solid remains from the WWTP are called sewage sludge or "biosolids". The term "biosolids" was created by the sludge industry as a cozier way to promote the solid byproduct of sludge after they were forced to stop ocean dumping because it was poisoning the oceans. Unfortunately, the minimal testing requirements actually do not guarantee the health or safety of the water being returned to your community or the biosolids/sewage sludge used as a "fertilizer" for your food.
There are no federal guidelines for the testing of dioxin and a myriad of
other highly toxic industrial byproducts currently found in most municipal
sludge. No federal, state or government agency has ever conducted conclusive
scientific studies that prove pouring known toxic waste on our food, water and
communities is safe. The use of sewage sludge on any open land means that these
antimicrobial compounds, as well as the host of other heavy metals,
pharmaceuticals and hormones, may be absorbed by crops and find their way up the
food chain and into human diets. Thousands of modern and discontinued chemicals
used in U.S. industry eventually find their way into the sewer system and then
into municipal sludge. These chemicals interact to form new and often more toxic
chemicals.
Instead, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the
bureaucracy responsible for sewage sludge safety, maintains that the minimal
testing requirements of nine elements - arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury,
molybdenum, nickel, selenium, zinc - and two pathogens - salmonella OR E. coli -
are sufficient in estimating our health risk. Biosolids/sludge is classified
as Class A if they show no salmonella OR E. coli when testing at the waste water
treatment plant. Class B sludge means levels of salmonella OR E. coli have been
registered. This is the only difference between classes of sewage sludge. Class
A can be spread anywhere without recording location or amount.
Newest
studies from researchers at Yale University, Connecticut find that
sludge/biosolids isn't heated high enough to kill pathogens. This is no surprise
- in 2006, studies funded by the sludge industry Water Environmental Research
Foundation (WERF) - formerly known as the Federation of Sewage Workers - noted
that sludge/biosolids that were dewatered by centrifuge created a material that
passed standard bacteria tests, yet just 20 minutes after dewatering, showed
substantial increase in bacterial counts. WERF also released findings that
confirm the re-growth of fecal coliform after treatment. Rocket science? Hardly
- bacteria re-grow after treatment.
The U.S. EPA created regulations in 1993
that permits sewage sludge that is too contaminated with certain toxic
pollutants to be disposed of safely in a landfill to be promoted as a fertilizer
for farms, landscaping, playgrounds, golf courses and bagged
compost.
Nearly half of all the municipal sewage sludge produced in the
USA each year -- up to 8 million tons --�is land applied. Known toxins and
antibiotics found by the EPA in sewage sludge have no regulations, remain
untested for the impact on human health and are introduced into our food and
water supply through land application as a fertilizer option. Dozens of
chemicals introduced into the environment are neurodevelopmental toxins,
altering brain growth. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB), dioxin, brominated flame
retardants and pesticides are examples, and all are found in sewage
sludge.
The issue of land application of sewage sludge is two-fold: the
infiltration of known toxic waste in America's food and water supply and
community impact where sewage sludge is land applied. There is no state or
national systematic tracking of health incidents related to sewage sludge. In
some cases, laws are put into place to remove the community's right to restrict
or even test for sewage sludge safety.
If you live in communities that spread sewage sludge, odors are often a cause of complaints surrounding land application and, until recently, odors have been dismissed as a purely esthetic or quality-of-life issue. But evidence that exposure to odor-causing chemicals can cause illness is mounting. Some airborne contaminants can cause a variety of symptoms including eye, nose, and throat irritation, headache, nausea, diarrhea, hoarseness, sore throat, cough, chest tightness, nasal congestion, palpitations, shortness of breath, stress, drowsiness, and alterations in mood. When residents living near land where sewage sludge is applied report symptoms, they are often dismissed by the bureaucracies and elected officials charged to protect their health and safety.
The following health concern examples, lifted from years of scientific studies and media reports, are just a small sample of the true concern of the poisoning of the very elements that sustain life -- our food, water and homes. Full articles follow, as well as an overview and support articles concerning food and water issues. Really, our health cannot be separated from the food we eat and the water we drink --�it's just common sense.
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health, in 2007, reported in their, Health Survey of Residents Living Near Farm Fields Permitted to Receive Biosolids . The findings suggest an increased risk for certain respiratory, gastrointestinal, and other diseases among residents living near farm fields on which the use of biosolids was permitted:
"Many of the risks to individuals living near farm fields where biosolids were applied are chronic and may be evident only after long-term exposure. Such effects are difficult to measure and relate to exposure from these fields. In conclusion, our findings suggest an increased risk for certain respiratory, gastrointestinal, and other diseases among residents living near farm fields where the application of biosolids was permitted. Moreover, the reported occurrence of certain chronic diseases, such as multiple sclerosis, were elevated in the exposed group."
In 2009, University of California reported that California's sevenfold
increase in autism cannot be explained by changes in doctors' diagnoses and most
likely is due to environmental exposures.
"It's time to start looking for
the environmental culprits responsible for the remarkable increase in the rate
of autism in California,"�said Irva Hertz-Picciotto, an epidemiology professor at
University of California, Davis who led the study.
Throughout the nation, the numbers of
autistic children have increased dramatically over the past 15 years. Autistic
children have problems communicating and interacting socially; the symptoms
usually are evident by the time the child is a toddler. Researchers theorize
that pregnant woman's exposure to chemical pollutants, particularly metals and
pesticides, could be altering a developing baby's brain structure, triggering
autism. Some California farms that grow America's fruits and vegetables, use
the water exiting waste water treatment plants to irrigate crops. Is it safe to
use sewage sludge and the waste water effluent as crop fertilizer and
irrigation? Never tested for human safety.
Pollution from sewage sludge, animal slurry and disinfectants add to the rise in bacteria resistant to the most powerful antibiotics. Media headlines describing hospital infections caused by superbugs - such as Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus known as MRSA - often blame over-prescription of antibiotics and poor hygiene standards, but these are just two of the reasons why bacteria now resist many antibiotics.
Research by Dr. Will Gaze, Professor Liz Wellington and Professor Peter Hawkey of the University of Warwick and Birmingham University, United Kingdom, studied antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria living in soils, and how pollution may influence the way resistance evolves. Antibiotics and other chemicals drive antibiotic resistance into rivers and soils in many ways. Industry uses larges volumes of detergents and disinfectants - including quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) - know together as biocides. Nearly all domestic cleaning products and shampoos also contain QACs. They wash out in large volumes with the waste water from factories and homes. QAC resistance genes are significant because they are often located with antibiotic resistance genes on the same piece of DNA, so exposure to one will co-select for the other.
A new drug resistant pneumonia, known as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs), has a mortality rate between 22% and 59%. Outbreaks throughout the country, including Virginia, North Carolina and Florida, are persistent and of great concern to the medical community.
"The emergence of KPC resistance is a major threat to global health. Recent results show that KPC genes are diverse, stable genetic elements that can be difficult to detect. Furthermore, KPC-producing organisms can spread inside hospitals as well as in the community setting." Luke F. Chen, MBBS, of Duke University, North Carolina, published these findings in 2009. What is the role of sewage sludge land application in spreading these antibiotic resistant diseases into the community? Never tested for human safety.
One study out of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health 2007,
predicted up to 25% annual increases in the cryptosporidiosis rate in a
community consuming products from agricultural lands where sewage sludge end
products were legally applied.
Cryptosporidiosis, a
parasitic disease that is often spread through fecal-oral contaminated water
route, affects the intestines of mammals. The main symptom is diarrhea in people
with intact immune systems but in immuno-compromised individuals, such as AIDS
patients, the symptoms are particularly severe and often fatal. Do the known
pathogens in sewage sludge contaminate our food, water and communities? Never
tested for human safety.
Scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), at their 2009 conference, discussed the newly completed studies of ocean beach users increasing risk of staph and MRSA infections, and that current treatments for seafood poisoning may be less effective due to higher than expected antibiotic resistance. Antibiotics and other toxicants discharged into the waste stream by humans may increase the frequency of antibiotic-resistant Vibrio strains in contaminated coastal environments.
Carolyn Sotka, with the NOAA Oceans and Human Health Initiative states, "Without doubt, this research will develop new understandings of ocean health risks and perhaps more importantly crucial discoveries that will lead to new solutions to looming public health problems."
From 2001 to 2004, Washington, D.C., experienced what may have been the worst lead contamination of city water on record. Tens of thousands of homes had sky-high levels of lead at the tap, and in the worst cases, tap water contained enough lead to be classified as hazardous waste. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention did not release reports until investigations in 2009.
In July of 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched an environmental public-health tracking network to help scientists and the public explore potential links between environmental contaminants and chronic diseases. "While the health effects of lead and certain other contaminants are generally known, other suspected links between diseases and pollutants remain unproven, partly because environmental and health data are collected and kept separately," said CDC's Michael McGeehin.
A 2009 Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center researcher has uncovered the unique finding that groundwater and airborne manganese in North Carolina correlates with cancer mortality at the county level. Lead researcher John Spangler, M.D., professor of family and community medicine at Wake Forest Baptist, found that groundwater manganese appears to be positively associated with total cancer, colon cancer, and lung cancer death rates, while airborne manganese concentrations appear to be inversely associated with total cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer death rates.
By EPA's own studies, there is widespread contamination. The EPA 1982 paper
discusses sewage sludge noting, "Several researchers have pointed out that waste
water, treated or untreated, is a primary contributor of bacteria to the aquatic
ecosystem. Other studies have been conducted which demonstrate that significant
numbers of mutli-drug-resistant coliforms occur in rivers, bays, bathing beaches
and coastal canals. Waters contaminated by bacteria capable of transferring drug
resistance are of great concern since there is the potential for transfer of
antibiotic resistance to a pathogenic species."
The point here is that the cleaner
the released effluent, the dirtier the residual solids, the biosolids.
Then, this far-reaching statement: "These organisms may subsequently transfer
this resistance to pathogenic organisms, resulting in reduced efficacy of
antimicrobial chemotherapy in the event of an infection. In vivo studies have
shown that when individuals carrying R+bacteria are subjected to antibiotic
therapy, these organisms flourish and transfer their resistance to other
bacteria."
FOOD & SEWAGE SLUDGE: LEGALIZING THE POISONING OF OUR FOOD SUPPLY
The lack of guidance about the use of sewage sludge where our food is grown is stunning. Our knowledge about the issue has dramatically increased since the late 1970's and early 1980's, when the practice of using farmland as an inexpensive waste dump for municipal sewage became a national policy. Often proponents of sewage sludge fertilizer site the historical use of human manure as proof of safety, conveniently disregarding the increased use and disposal of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, viruses, pathogens, hormones and other toxic waste from our modern lifestyle. The danger of sewage sludge is not a curious scientific or medical mystery, but is a known and foreseeable health and safety issue.
The 1981 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documen, Land Application of Municipal Sewage Sludge for the Production of Fruits and Vegetables: A Statement of Federal Policy, fully recognizes the potential dangers. The guidelines are filled with wording, if the guidelines are followed, and although the cumulative cadmium in land application may be reached, yet the application of sewage to farmland is based on the nitrogen and phosphorous rates. In fact, the 1981 EPA guidelines find no danger in polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) levels; only encourage incorporation in the soil. Studies included noting that human food crops like carrots have levels of PCBs but, "assumes that carrots will receive the normal processing of scrubbing and peeling, since carrots tend to accumulate PCB's in the skin" (pg 9). No mystery - we know that PCB's are carcinogenic and are linked to dysfunction in organs including the liver and brain yet the EPA refuses to control the distribution of this toxin on our food supply.
Even this document, signed by the US EPA, US Department of Agriculture and the US Food and Drug Administration, recognizes that heavy metals translocate into edible tissue of plants and animals. "However, many sludges also contain substances which could contaminate such crops and make them unfit for human consumption. The contaminants of greatest concern are the heavy metals, toxic organic compounds, and pathogenic microorganisms." (pg 2). "The EPA federal policy recognizes the following edible plants by gauging their metal uptake: high uptake: ettuce, spinach, chard, escarole, endive, cress, turnip greens, carrots; moderate uptake: kale, collards, beets, turnips, radish, mustard, potatoes, and onion."
No food crop, aside from USDA organic, is regulated from growing on land treated with sewage sludge fertilizer. Some industry food companies who are not necessarily organic, like Del Monte and Heinz, have taken a cautious route to consumer health and safety and choose not to purchase food grown in sludge. The EPA - responsible for setting the national standard for the safe use of toxic substances like sewage sludge - requires testing by the sludge hauler or municipal waste treatment plant for only 9 substances and one bacteria. There are no standard requirements for testing of heavy metal or toxin build-up in the soil that receive sewage sludge. In fact, the standards for the testing and deposit of products delivered to landfills are stricter and more regulated than for products delivered to the location of our food and water supply. One example is that both radiation and cadmium are required to be tested for landfill deposit, but neither are required testing if they are deposited on farmland, parks, playground and fertilizer.
In 1978, Cornell Waste Management Institute applied Syracuse, New York sludge, to on-site test orchards with the goal of tracking the high levels of toxic pollutants, such as PCB's and dioxin. Retesting the soils as recently as 2001, no noticeable change in the toxicity level of the soil of these known cancer causing pollutants was discovered. Sewage sludge commonly contains high levels of heavy metals that do not require testing or regulation, yet scientific studies prove that heavy metals accumulate not only in the soil where the sludge is spread but also in the plants and animal that we ingest. Because heavy metals and other know toxins accumulate in our bodies from the foods we eat, the water we drink, the products we use and the air we breathe, eliminating know sources from our food source and environmental system is not only sensible, but necessary.
Concentrations of cadmium, mercury, lead, silver, and tin are higher in sludge than human and animal manure. Tin and silver, found in most sludge, does not dilute in soil and is highly toxic. Other metals like sulfur, molybdenum, iron and cadmium interfere with the health of grazing animals, resulting in weight loss, lower productivity and reproductive failures. Certainly, healthier animals produce a healthier food supply, reducing the need for medications, antibiotics and hormones. Buildup of some metals, like cadmium, mercury and lead, are known to be cumulative and toxic to animals and humans. Metals such as copper, nickel and zinc are known to be damaging to crops and are relatively immobilein soils, they do not wash away, disappear in sunlight and persist for decades. By constantly adding sewage sludge to farmlands, we are inviting the destruction of the very source of our nourishment. In fact, farms throughout America have already begun failing due to toxic levels of metals and chemicals.
Nothing highlights the sewage sludge poisoning of our food source like the situation of two Georgia farms, Andy McElmurray and Bill Boyce. In 1979, Andy McElmurray accepted "safe" sludge from the city of Augusta as a free fertilizer option. McElmurray noticed multiple Salmonella outbreaks in his dairy cows after grazing on sludged fields. Then in 1989, a marked decrease in milk production developed in the herd and McElmurray�s cows died slowly, withering with painful AIDS-like symptoms.
Boyceland Dairy Farms boasted a state prize-winning herd. Beautiful animals, excellent milk. In 1984, Bill Boyce accepted sewage sludge as a free fertilizer option. About ten years later, milk production suddenly collapsed and cows began sickening and dying at an alarming rate. 300 of Boyce's prize-winning animals died. So did the family farm he had planned to pass on to his children.
Concerned about the unsettling pattern that both farms were experiencing, McElmurray and Boyce tested their soil, silage animal food and milk. The results were stunning - the sludged land contained toxic levels of compounds like heavy metals, arsenic and PCB's two to 2,500 times federal health standards. The milk contained levels of thallium, an element formerly used in rat poison, in concentrations 120 times higher than allowed in drinking water. Many of the toxic compounds that collectively killed their land and livestock did not require testing to pass sludge safety standards. Ultimately, lawsuits were filed, but across America farmers continue to be offered this free fertilizer option. Litigation on this issue is ongoing, yet sewage sludge safety concerns from farmers and communities are dismissed by policy makers and elected representatives.
Many chemicals that are contained in wastewater become concentrated in sludges. This is particularly true for fat-soluble persistent organic chemicals, include PCB's, dioxins and flame retardants (polybrominated biphenyles or PBB). National EPA required pollutant scans does not include persistent organic chemicals. Because these are fat-soluble bio-accumulative chemicals, they gather in fat tissue, meat and milk of livestock during grazing, becoming part of the food chain. Children are at special risk, since dioxin gathers in both animal milk and the breast milk for nursing mother. Many of these chemicals pose known cancer risks as well as developmental risks.
Triclocarban, a substance used in anti-bacterial soap, passes through the waste water treatment system and gathers in sewage sludge. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reported in a 2006 study that 75% of triclocarban, a known toxic substance when ingested, passes through the waste water treatment plant and is now traced to contaminating rivers and streams.
"Triclocarban does not break down easily even under the intense measures applied during wastewater treatment," states senior author Rolf U. Halden, PhD. "The irony is twofold. First, to protect our health, we mass-produce and use a toxic chemical which the Food and Drug Administration has determined has no scientifically proven benefit. Second, when trying to do the right thing by recycling nutrients contained in biosolids, we end up spreading a known reproductive toxicant on the soil where we grow our food."
Sludge contains pathogens and endotoxins (illness causing cell wall material that remain after bacteria die). Pathogens are reduced before sludge application, endotoxins are not studied. Also, bacteria, viruses and parasites are found in sludge but not regulated. Federal rules assume that pathogens will be killed through environmental exposure, yet no studies by any federal, state or independent scientific community confirm this casual approach to spreading know infectious contaminations on our communities, food and water supply.
At one time food poisoning from salmonella and E. coli was associated with consuming contaminated animal products. But recent outbreaks of food poisoning in vegetables such as spinach, tomatoes, pistachios, peanut butter, alfalfa sprouts and bagged salad gives cause for re-evaluations. According to the Center for Disease Control, more than 200 known diseases are transmitted through foods, causing 6 million to 81 million illnesses and 9,000 deaths in the United States annually. And studies published by the Institute of Science in Society noted a two to tenfold increase in food borne illness from 1994 to 1999. Feigning ignorance or innocence about the source of these bacterial and pathogen outbreaks, the bureaucracies charged with protecting our health, food and water refuse to connect the dots of the legal application of hazardous sewage sludge to our food source. Common sense dispels the mystery that educated minds seem to miss -- if you pour your waste on your food, you will get sick.
Scientists know that both salmonella and E. coli can spread to vegetables if fertilized with contaminated manure or water during growing and harvesting. Yet the practice of using the water released back into the community from the waste water treatment plants, called� effluence, is popular especially in dry landscapes and under drought conditions. The EPA only requires limiting indicator bacteria�of salmonella or E. coli. Sewage sludge is considered safe by EPA standards if either salmonella or E. coli is reduced at the source of testing� the wastewater treatment plant. Also, the indicator bacteria can pass EPA standards only to re-grow and increase once the sludge/biosolids becomes wet from water or rain. No further bacteria or pathogen testing is required.
Studies from the University of Hygiene, University of Graz, Austria evaluated the resistance patterns of E. coli in wastewater treatment plans. They found the highest resistance rates were found in E. coli strains that received not only municipal waste, but also hospital waste. Although there was a reduction in the value of the E. coli exiting the WWTP as effluence, resistant bacteria were found to be released into the environment.
Research by the Professor Gadi Frankel and Dr. Rob
Shaw, from Imperial College and University of Birmingham, London in 2008 give
a definitive link of how the bacteria and plants interact. The findings confirm
how bacteria like salmonella and other pathogens cause contamination in the
food chain, risking human health and safety. Among other findings, "scientists
know that salmonella and E. coli 0157, a strain of E. coli that causes sickness in
humans, can spread in salads and vegetables if they are fertilized with contaminated
manure, irrigated with contaminated water, or if they come into contact with
contaminated products during cutting, washing, packing and preparation
process."
Dr. Frankel notes that the number of cases of food poisoning from
salads and vegetables are likely to increase as people add more fruits and
vegetables to their diets in an effort to eat healthy. "All of these factors,
together with the globalization of the food market, mean that cases of
salmonella and E. coli poisoning caused by salads are likely to rise in the
future."
Salinas Valley, California has long been called the "Salad Bowl of America." Much of our fresh, leafy greens come from this valley. Because of groundwater salinity problem, some farms in the Salinas Valley use the Monterey Wastewater Treatment Plant waste water to water crops. The effluence from the plant is piped up to 20 miles to the irrigation sites. Although there are no published reports on the microbial quality of the effluent use for irrigation at the point of use, bacteria from the WWTP shows an antibiotic resistance.� Fresh produce is increasingly implicated in food-related illness. E. coli can survive in soil and water, and can be transferred onto plant surfaces through farm practices such as irrigation.
With the exception of salmonella and E. coli, the EPA does not require testing for any pathogens, pharmaceuticals, steroids, viruses, hormones or endotoxins. Deadly pathogens that are found to infect our hospitals, such as MRSA are discovered in our waterways and on our beaches, yet the EPA refrains from re-evaluating the national testing standards. The chemicals, heating and squeezing at waste water treatment plants do not cure or eliminate our modern hazardous waste.
The development of antibiotic resistance within sewer plants is well known. Dr. Amy Pruden of Colorado State University for which she received the highest US civilian national award in 2006, demonstrated that the genetic fragments, antibiotic resistant genes which are developed within sewer plants, pass to the environment and, in spite of chlorination, are picked up in fresh water intakes, pass through drinking water treatment chlorination and filtration and end in the potable water supply.
Dr.� Pruden, along with Dr. Edo McGowan, medical geo-hydrologist, and Dr. Joan B. Rose of Michigan State University, all served on a WERF/US EPA expert team looking at the subject of pathogens in sewage sludge/biosolids. Dr. McGowan states, "We tested some of the recycled water produced in California (waste water treatment plants) under state criteria. This is recycled water that is tertiary treated and chlorinated prior to release. What we found when we ran tests on this finished water was multi-drug resistance, in one case resistance to 11 of the 12 test materials. We noted bacteria that were obviously also resistant to chlorine. We tested water from two separate sewer districts. We attempted to test a third district source that uses the water to spray irrigate strawberries and broccoli. When we stated why we wanted to test this water we were promptly refused and immediately handed off to the district�s legal counsel."
How safe is the sewage sludge legally spread on our food and water supply? With the EPA regulation requiring testing for only nine elements -- mercury, arsenic, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, cadmium, copper, lead and zinc -- and reduction of only salmonella or E. coli, the list of know toxins in sludge that do not require testing and are found on a regular basis are vast. These include plutonium found in Boulder, Colorado; radiation found in sludge from Royersford, Pennsylvania: Teflon type chemicals, including perfluorooctanoic acids, or PFOs and PFOAs in agricultural soils where cattle graze in Decatur, Alabama: salmonella in groundwater from run-off in Athens, Georgia; hermaphrodite frogs and fish found downstream from wastewater treatment plants; flame retardants and the disinfectant triclosan found in every sewage sludge sample tested by the EPA in their 2007 national survey. Although the affects of these toxins on soil organisms, plants and grazing livestock, animals, water and humans is known, the EPA and US government bureaucracies refuse to re-evaluate the practice of land applying sewage sludge.
WHO SAYS NO
Terms like "natural" and "healthy" don't protect your food supply -- they prohibit hormones. USDA organic products are restricted from using sewage sludge as a fertilizer, but sludge industry pressures are a constant threat to this bastion of safe sustenance. Some industry food companies who are not necessarily organic, like Del Monte and Heinz, have taken a cautious route to consumer health and safety and choose not to purchase food grown in sludge.
Noting possible environmental hazards, European laws enacted in 2003, lists PBBs as one of 6 controlled substances under, "Restriction of Hazardous Substance Directive." Other countries have followed suit, including China and South Korea in 2007. Concerns regarding organic chemicals include ecological impacts to soil health and wildlife and entry into the human food chain, particularly through accumulation in dairy products.
In March 2009, the Irish Grain Assurance Scheme voted that they will not support grains grown in sewage sludge. Concern over serious lack of legislative control over the spreading of sewage sludge on agricultural crops prompted the move and officials from the Food Safety Authority, Irish Grain and Feed Association and Department of Agriculture voted to follow suit.
And from environmental organizations, like the Sierra Club and Audubon of Florida, comes a view of the sewage sludge issue that recognizes our role and participation in the food and water cycle
Who says "No" to sewage sludge? Communities and individuals just like you. Contact food companies and tell them you want a sludge-free guarantee -- and forward their reply to us! Tell your grocery store manager you are concerned about sewage sludge in our food supply (yes, their business associations know this issue!). Buy organic when possible. If you buy from local farmers, ask if they use sludge or biosolids on their farm. Call your elected officials. Throughout America and the world, people are taking a stand and demanding that our policy makers protect the people, not the policy. Demand safe food --�demand the halt of land application of sewage sludge.
WATER - DON'T FLUSH WHERE YOU DRINK
Without water, we are without life, so why don't we treat our water sources and systems with the respect for maintaining our survival?� As more viruses, pathogens, hormones, pharmaceuticals and toxic chemicals are discovered in the waters that sustain us, the need to re-evaluate of the role of the bureaucracies that are charged with protecting our health, safety and communities is called into question.
In 2006, water borne diseases world-wide were estimated to cause 1.8 million deaths annually, while about 1.1 billion people lacked proper drinking water. If the water we drink is of questionable quality, what is the quality of the water that we introduce back to our communities after we have used it? What does water quality have to do with land application of sewage sludge?
In some United States communities, water standards have not changed since the 1970s, when the concept of safe drinking water was recognized as an impact to health. By setting a low legal standard for what is considered safe in the water and sewage sludge released from the waste water treatment plants back into a community, municipalities avoid the expense of updating facilities and industries avoid the expense - and responsibility - of eliminating toxic products. Instead, all expenses are passed on to the health and safety of our citizens and the environment that sustains us.
Everything that goes down the drain of homes, businesses, industries, hospitals and mortuaries collects at the municipal waste water treatment plants (WWTP). WWTP were created and intended to separate the liquids from the solids to clean the water in order to return it to the community. Water returned into the community is called effluence and is often poured directly into waterways, stream and river or used to water crops or lawns. The solid remains from the WWTP are called sewage sludge or biosolids. The term biosolids was created by the sludge industry as a cozier way to promote the solid byproduct of sludge after they were forced to stop ocean dumping because it was poisoning the oceans. Unfortunately, the minimal testing requirements actually do not guarantee the health or safety of the water being returned to your community.
In 1981, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published a study expressing concerns about widespread contamination. The EPA paper, written by Mark Meckes discusses sewage sludge, "Several researchers have pointed out that waste water, treated or untreated, is a primary contributor of bacteria to the aquatic ecosystem. Other studies have been conducted which demonstrate that significant numbers of multi-drug-resistant coliforms occur in rivers, bays, bathing beaches and coastal canals. Waters contaminated by bacteria capable of transferring drug resistance are of great concern since there is the potential for transfer of antibiotic resistance to a pathogenic species."
The message: the cleaner the released effluent, the dirtier the sewage sludge/biosolids.
The Clean Water Act, helpful in halting the ocean dumping of sewage sludge,
stipulates that US EPA must identify and regulate toxic pollutants that may be
present sewage sludge at levels of concern for public health and the
environment.
The EPA survey,
called the Targeted National Sewage Sludge Survey
, sampled WWTP in 35 states from 2006 to 2007. This annual survey
determines which chemicals are present in sewage sludge to estimate national
concentrations and exposures to citizens by testing samples for 145 compounds,
including 28 metals, 11 flame retardants, 72 pharmaceuticals, and 25 steroids
and hormones.
The antimicrobial triclocarban was detected
in all 84 samples collected, while its cousin triclosan is found in 79
out of 84 collected samples. Triclocarban was found to have the
highest concentrations ever detected in sewage sludge. The antibiotic, ofloxacin,
had the third highest concentration. Why does this matter? Because the
known toxins and antibiotics found by the EPA in sewage sludge have no regulations,
remain untested for the impact on human health and are introduced into our food
and water supply through land application as a fertilizer option. Instead, the
EPA maintains that the minimal testing requirements of nine elements�-- arsenic,
cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, molybdenum, nickel, selenium, zinc�-- and two pathogens�-- salmonella
OR E. coli�-- are sufficient in estimating our health risk. No federal, state or
government agency has ever conducted conclusive scientific studies that prove
pouring known toxic waste on our food, water and communities is safe. The use of
sewage sludge on any open land means that these antimicrobial compounds, as well
as the host of other heavy metals, pharmaceuticals and hormones, may be absorbed
by crops and find their way up the food chain and into human diets. What
compounds are being found in our waterways?
WAR ON DRUGS - ENDOCRIN DISRUPTORS & PHARMACUETICALS
The endocrine
system is the system of glands and hormones that regulates bodily functions
including growth, response to stress, sexual development and behavior,
production and utilization of insulin, rate of metabolism, intelligence and
behavior, and the ability to reproduce. When endocrine disruptors are
introduced into our physical bodies and the environment that grows our food and
water, they disrupt or upset the hormonal balance that the body needs to
function properly. Examples of endocrine disruptors infiltrating our water
sources, such as displaced pharmaceuticals and chemical waste, are numerous and
relentless.
World-wide, scientists have found sexual abnormalities
in wild animals exposed to sewage effluence and
industrial contaminants.� Repeatedly, scientists are discovering sexually abnormalities,
especially in male species of animals like frogs, fish and alligators. The effects
of hormone disrupting chemicals and pharmaceuticals introduced into
our communities, landscapes and waterways are becoming apparent. In 2008, Children's
Hospital of Philadelphia reported findings of genital defects in baby boys doubled
in the last 30 years, while a 2007 study in the Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology & Metabolism notes a drop in testosterone levels in American men, both
are related to environmental exposures. National watershed studies have
found pharmaceuticals in the watersheds of 28 major metro areas. Yet, there are
no standards, no mandates, and no controls to test, treat or limit
pharmaceuticals in water. Think you'll just purchase clean water once your hometown source
or well has become contaminated? The bottled water industry faces the same
federal standards for pharmaceuticals as tap water --�none.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg
School of Public Health reported in a 2006 study that 75% of triclocarban, a
known toxic substance when ingested, passes through the waste water treatment
plant and is now traced to contaminating rivers and streams. Triclocarban and
its cousin triclosan - used in products including antibacterial hand soap,
cosmetics, clothing and toys - are linked to hormonal disruption. In mammals,
including humans, triclosan has also been found in urine, umbilical cord blood
and breast milk.
Along coastal bays and waterways in California, fish have
developed liver tumors and the sexual slurring of female reproductive parts
found in male species from the chemical nonylphenols, a common ingredient in
detergents, cosmetic products, and spermicides. The Los Angeles Times brought a
startling discovery to the public's attention
in 2005: scientists found male
flatfish with female characteristics. The intersex fish, found near the three
massive wastewater outfalls that dump treated sewage effluent into the Pacific
Ocean, serve Los Angeles and adjacent Orange County. Scientists speculate that
the daily 4 billion gallons WWTP discharge is disrupting the endocrine systems
of the fish.
"All the intersex fish were found between the Los Angeles and Orange County outfalls," says biologist Steve Bay, of the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. "No such sexual defects were found elsewhere. Two-thirds of the male turbot and sole caught near Orange County's sewage outfall had vitellogenin, or egg-producing proteins, more commonly found in female fish. In laboratory experiments, male fish exposed to ocean sediment collected from the same area all produced vitellogenin."
Regardless of the scientific findings and the concerns of health professional world-wide, the water regulations remain relatively unchanged. During flu season, it's not surprising that Tamiflu is detected in waterways. A 2008 Associated Press investigation found prescription drugs have been detected in the drinking water supplies of 41 million Americans living in 24 major metropolitan areas. These drugs include the hormones found in birth control pills, antibiotics and psychotropic medications. Treatment systems can remove some, but not all of the drugs; in fact, chlorine used to disinfect water can make some drugs more toxic. Nonylphenols are chemicals that mutate and increase potency from mixing with other chemicals at the waste water treatment plant. Other countries, including the European Union and Canada have effectively banned or classified nonylphenol as a toxic chemical, restricting uses in waterways. In the U.S., allowable levels of nonylphenol are twice the allowable levels of Canada.
The government has set no national standards for how much of any pharmaceutical is too much in waterways or taps. Drugs in the environment are "not currently a priority" of the National Center for Environmental Health, says spokesman Charles L. Green, at its parent U.S. Centers for Disease Control.
BACTERIA, SALMONELLA & E. COLI
Hospitals discharge considerable amounts of chemicals and microbial agents in
their wastewaters. Problem chemicals in hospital wastewater belong to different
groups, such as antibiotics, X-ray contrast agents, disinfectants and
pharmaceuticals. Many of these chemical compounds resist normal wastewater
treatment and none, with the exception of salmonella OR E. coli, are required
testing by the EPA.
�
According to medical geo-hydrologist Dr. Edo
McGowan, "[Bacteria] end up in surface waters where they can influence the
aquatic ecosystem and interfere with the food chain. Humans are particularly
exposed by the drinking water produced from surface water. Microbial agents of
special concern are multi-resistant microbial strains. The latter are suspected
to contribute to the spread of antibiotic resistance."
�The development of antibiotic resistance within sewer plants is well known. Dr. Amy Pruden's work showed that antibiotic resistant genes are developed within sewer plants, pass into the environment, are picked up in fresh water intakes, and end in the potable water supply. Dr. McGowan, Dr. Amy Pruden, of Colorado State University, and Dr. Joan B. Rose, of Michigan State University, all served on a US EPA expert team looking at the subject of pathogens in sewage sludge/biosolids.
"Testing of finished recycled water (effluence) demonstrated that the water
had acquired antibiotic resistance. The bugs were resistant to 11 of 12
antibiotics," says Dr. McGowan. "Unfortunately, what we are facing is now a
major biological, not chemical issue. That issue is antibiotic resistance and
increased virulence. Dilution does not work well for pollutants that have the
capacity for vast multiplication and adaptation to environmental
niches."
�
Researchers at the University of Georgia in Athens (UGA)
report a rise of salmonella in rivers and streams after rains carry contaminated
runoff from landscapes. Salmonella, found in 79 percent of water sampled from
rivers and streams in southern Georgia, had the highest concentration during the
steamy summer months.� Salmonella bacteria, also responsible for food
poisoning of citizens throughout America, are awash in the waterways that
sustain human, plant and animal life.
"If the (tainted) water is used to irrigate crops, it would likely contaminate the crop," says Michael Doyle, director of UGA's Center for Food Safety. Polluted water used to irrigate or clean produce has been linked to salmonella.
In 2006, studies funded by the sludge industry Water Environmental Research Foundation (WERF) - formerly known as the Federation of Sewage Workers - noted that sludge/biosolids that were dewatered by centrifuge created a material that passed standard bacteria tests, yet just 20 minutes after dewatering, showed substantial increase in bacterial counts. WERF also released findings that confirm the re-growth of fecal coliform after treatment. Rocket science? Hardly - bacteria re-grow after treatment.
Studies funded by sludge industry recognize the limitations of their own products and the false marketing of stabilized sewage sludge from WWTP. Scientific studies and warnings by independent scientists are ignored. The industry and bureaucracy continues to resist responsibility for providing real safety to the America public.
University of Minnesota (UNM) scientists, including Kris McNeill and Bill Arnold, presented 2009 studies linking PBDE flame retardants exposed to waste water treatment can transform to generate dioxin, a chemical known to cause birth defects, endocrine disruptors and cancer. Experts agree that both the dioxins and the compounds that produce them, hydroxylated PBDEs (OH-PBDEs), could be impacting aquatic wildlife and humans.
Supporting these findings is a report by the U.S. National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration (NOAA), which documents PBDEs in U.S. coastal waters. John H. Dunnigan, assistant administrator of NOAA�s National Ocean Service, notes "Scientific evidence strongly documents that these contaminants impact the food web and action is needed to reduce the threats posed to aquatic resources and human health." Toxicity studies have connected PBDEs to liver, thyroid, and neurobehavioral development impairments and, "show the potential for adverse human health effects."
"It's logical to assume if you have PBDEs [in
wastewater], you'll have OH-PBDEs...and if the OH-PBDEs are exposed to sunlight,
you're going to get brominated dioxins formed in the water," UNM scientist
Arnold says.� And remember, the 2007 EPA Targeted National Sewage
Sludge Survey
found flame
retardants in every sewage sludge sample test.
Terms like "natural"and
"organic" have suffered as the chemical and industrial interests "greenwash"
America's vocabulary for monetary gain. For instance, arsenic and lead are
natural, organic compounds. Both cause negative, even deadly, health effects.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, analyzed research data from
2004, linking arsenic in US drinking water to increases in diabetes. Arsenic
also affects nearly all the organs in the body, causing aliments including lung,
skin and kidney cancer, internal bleeding and heart damage, kidney and liver
failure, and birth defects. Disregarding advances in science and technology that
make it possible to strengthen regulations, the EPA stated in 2003, "The agency
decided that changes to these standards would not provide a meaningful
opportunity for health risk reduction." The EPA has also recognized the
hormone-disrupting chemicals must be studied in combination with other toxins,
yet refuse to reevaluate their own testing and regulation requirements.
WATER, WATER EVERYWHERE - BUT TOO TOXIC TO DRINK?
Constant pollution comes from constant sources -- paved surfaces, overflowing waste water treatment plants, industry, agricultural run-off, legal and illegal dumping of toxic waste into the waters that sustain America. In fact, every industry can legally pour 33 pounds of hazardous waste down the drain a month without reporting to any government body. Recent examples of our constant chemical flush into our waterways include: Dec. 2007 - Merck Pharmaceutical fined $20 million for polluting Delaware River, Philadelphia, PA drinking supply; Nov. 2008 - sludge applied to flood plain area in Prescott, AZ; Nov. 2008 - Tahlequah, OK applies sludge that was tested for salmonella, even as the test failed for fecal coliform; April 2009 - Atlantic State Cast Iron Pipe Company of Phillipsburg, NJ $8 million in fines for contamination of the Delaware River; Sept. 2009�- MRSA found on beaches in Washington state; Oct. 2009 - Thompsonville, NC 15.9 million gallon sewage sludge spill into Yadkin River.
Sadly, these examples are a minute representation of the constant challenges to the health and safety of our water. In 2005, Congress voted to exempt the oil and gas industry from complying with the Safe Drinking Water Act. Consider that many cities and municipalities gather their drinking water from the very rivers that receive their sewage treatment effluence. Storm water related violations of the Clean Water Act, including overflowing waste water treatment plants, pollute waterways and rivers and are the leading cause of impairment to the nearly 40 percent of surveyed U.S. water bodies which do not meet water quality standards. From both land and storm sewer systems, polluted runoff is discharged, often untreated, directly into local water bodies. Since the late 1990's, the federal government has issued consent decrees to communities for their Sanitary Sewer Overflows. Negotiated consent decrees between major American cities and the federal government exempt cities from the Clean Water Act, allowing sewage overflow into the very rivers that provide drinking water for the community.
Cited for failing to comply with federal requirements for land disposal of sludge/biosolids, some municipalities are fined for breaking the law. Excessive application of sludge can result in nitrate contamination of surface or ground water, as well as expose people and animals to unsafe levels of pathogens, such as bacteria and viruses. The following communities were fined for breaking the law in 2009:
- Sheffield Utilities, in Sheffield, Ala. (civil penalty of $900)
- City of Perry, Fl. (civil penalty of $1,600)
- City of Cartersville, Ga. (civil penalty of $900)
- City of Sandersville, Ga. (civil penalty of $900)
- Town ofRutherfordton, N.C. (civil penalty of $900)
Do these fines actually discourage pollution or make a mockery of the democratic process by claiming to "get tough" on violations?
The wastewater industry seems to be the last industry to want to clean up its act. Discharging contaminated waste water effluents back into the community from the WWTP infects the communities, food and water source of America. Science, both inside and outside of the sludge industry, recognizes the reality and magnitude of the problem� -- we are poisoning the very waters that sustain us. It's no mystery how we have created and introduced new, powerful bacteria and pathogens. It's no mystery that we have created rampant health challenges by creating environmental Petri dishes of our communities. Our wildlife and landscape are merely the warning system of what we are doing to ourselves.
Tell your elected officials to make real laws about the safety of sewage sludge and the effects on your water, food and community. Our modern toxic waste does not belong in our food and water. Make the EPA and your state environmental agencies - paid with your tax dollars - accountable for real, safe disposal of sewage sludge. Our very life depends on it.

